<br>Hi Robert,<br><br>Thanks for your help in studying this problem.<br><br>Following your advise, I tested both<br><br>ImageFill_Cube test.mhd<br>and<br>ImageFill_Cube test.hdr<br><br>and in both images I see that<br>the first cube stays where it should but the second one disappeared!<br>
The only reason for such different behavior on your and my machines<br>I can think of is that on my server I am using ITK 3.16<br>released on September 15, 2009 vs your ITK CVS Nov 4, 2009.<br><br>Does that mean that IOFactory was updated somehow between these two releases?<br>
Well, if it was, I have to give the CVS version a try.<br><br>But anyway, according to your findings, this issue was not fixed<br>in ImageFileReader for all formats though<br>(or, in particular, for Analyze75 format), right?<br>
<br>Unfortunately all my input images are in the Analyze75 format, thus<br>any conversion would still require the Analyze75 support in ImageFileReader.<br><br>I see that we are getting close.<br><br>Regards,<br><br>Alex<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:06 AM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Robert.Atwood@diamond.ac.uk">Robert.Atwood@diamond.ac.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi Kevin:<br>
<br>
Which image format did you use for your tests? I observed (see my other<br>
post) that problem using .hdr format (as described by Oleksander's<br>
original post) but not with .mhd format. I believe I observed a similar<br>
problem before with .tif stack but not with a series of .tif (or .mhd)<br>
<br>
Do you observe the problem if you use .hdr format?<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
<div class="im"><br>
Robert<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:insight-users-bounces@itk.org">insight-users-bounces@itk.org</a><br>
</div><div class="im">[mailto:<a href="mailto:insight-users-bounces@itk.org">insight-users-bounces@itk.org</a>] On Behalf Of Kevin H. Hobbs<br>
Sent: 11 January 2010 15:01<br>
To: <a href="mailto:adzyubak@gmail.com">adzyubak@gmail.com</a><br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:insight-users@itk.org">insight-users@itk.org</a>; Luis Ibanez<br>
Subject: Re: [Insight-users] Image index limits<br>
<br>
</div><div><div class="h5">On 01/07/2010 05:28 PM, Oleksandr Dzyubak wrote:<br>
><br>
> ****** End JustReadWrite.cxx ***<br>
><br>
<br>
When I run this pair of programs I get two cubes in the output of the<br>
second program.<br>
<br>
I am using ITK from CVS on a 64 bit Linux workstation with 12 gigabytes<br>
of RAM (bubbles.hooperlab on the dashboard).<br>
<br>
I tried running ImageCompare on the input and output images but the<br>
machine started swapping and I cancelled the comparison.<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div>--<br>
<div><div class="h5">This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.<br>
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.<br>
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.<br>
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>