Ignore this post. I was reading from an old final parameters file.<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 10:25 PM, motes motes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mort.motes@gmail.com">mort.motes@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I am using the example data, the file with 128 parameter values, from the ITK library to deform an image:<br>
<br> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br>
0 0 0 0 2 2 5 5 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br> 0 0 0 0 5 5 10 170 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br> 0 0 0 0 2 2 5 5 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br>
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br>
<br>When the registration method returns the final parameters are:<br><br><br>[-0.00231844, -0.02326, 0.0484723, 0.0782189, 0.0917853, 0.119546, -0.00335514, -0.217619, -0.107065, 0, -0.0329693, -0.148395, 0.104663, -0.550282, -1.26802, -0.705694, 0.0873308, -0.309962, -0.802861, 0, 0.063379, 0.398289, -1.44105, -1.53938, -1.7608, -1.38484, -0.711425, -1.10221, -1.59358, 0, 0.298058, -0.564321, -1.91097, -3.58063, -6.30183, -4.78945, -1.61198, -0.70215, -0.954023, 0, 0.54965, -0.57544, -2.33652, -6.10376, -4.54323, -4.77601, -4.48725, -0.489267, -0.570523, 0, 0.668925, -0.46068, -2.42157, -4.74326, -12.8757, -6.57763, -1.16318, -3.09268, -0.411637, 0, 0.0390142, -0.273687, -0.624816, -1.51086, -2.18197, -1.86934, 0.297622, -1.07632, -0.0820767, 0, 0.0166208, -0.543326, 0.543721, -1.87936, 1.06337, 0.0752932, -0.0704278, -0.307334, -0.99684, 0, 0.00486263, -0.12788, -0.25644, -0.491107, 0.201335, -1.09141, -0.694021, -0.24188, -0.212387, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, -0.000112593, 0.0110926, 0.0167261, -0.049946, -0.0783788, -0.0384529, 0.0407556, -0.154947, -0.0463077, 0, -0.0182507, 0.00359299, 0.00784705, 0.270986, 1.90373, 0.0225429, -0.684401, -0.250102, 0.0345052, 0, -0.0636621, -0.364021, -1.0357, -2.70395, -4.77634, -0.987079, -0.837127, 1.46826, 0.682614, 0, -0.0313031, -0.717254, -0.545265, -17.2006, -31.0422, -20.0047, -2.02679, -1.18301, 0.0228328, 0, -0.0125886, -4.34123, 0.0787134, -45.9453, -66.6283, -50.7082, 1.52779, -1.68643, -0.339206, 0, 0.65181, -8.32657, 6.24457, -37.9488, -110.562, -54.1226, 3.39012, -0.0921196, 0.12512, 0, 1.67071, 0.694154, -3.71556, 9.19359, -8.64445, 14.5316, -1.12059, -0.852576, 0.59615, 0, 0.001542, -0.94513, -0.844656, -6.95102, 1.63441, -5.0893, -3.16847, 1.19829, 0.0257344, 0, -0.186464, -1.54877, 0.321253, 0.403886, -0.983199, -1.91005, -0.53617, -0.353148, -0.0942512, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]<br>
<br>That array contains 200 values. Why are there 200-128 = 72 more parameters in the final transform array? <br><br>I would like to use the final parameters array to transform the moving image into the fixed image space in another application, but would like to know why there are suddenly more parameters?<br>
</blockquote></div><br>